<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for StepInOut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://step-in-out.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://step-in-out.com</link>
	<description>Pursuing technology related to the blind community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government wants to update ADA for cyberspace by keith</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/11/government-wants-to-update-ada-for-cyberspace/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=248#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be very glad to see more movie theaters equipped with Rear Window technology. I was a little disappointed to learn that only about 1% currently are. Although the equipment isn&#039;t really all that far fetched. Heck, it&#039;s just the price of a couple accessible ready computer systems, or a cheap used car. With the bucks any given theater makes, it shouldn&#039;t be too unreasonable. It probably costs that much for one of their popcorn machines. 

I have mixed emotions over making web pages talk though. Blind web surfers most likely already have some sort of text to speech technology. Making a redundant voice on a web page to read it will only create a confusing situation of listening to two separate voices, at different quality, and different reading speed. Folks who might need it most are those who are on the fringes of poor eyesight, or in denial over their blindness, and don&#039;t have a text to speech product. Having a large print, easy to see button might then be helpful. I&#039;m sure coding it into the web page wouldn&#039;t be hard, but the web site owner would need to have the ability to run it on the server, and pay for the online site license. I know I can&#039;t afford it for my web pages. Most browsers have some sort of zoom feature to enlarge the text to 4 times or more.Although adding extra style sheets would be another thing, and probably the best thing a web site developer could do. 

The next best thing to do is to ban captcha images, and improve how screen readers access flash media players. Making photos readable shouldn&#039;t be all that important, unless they convey vital information that other text doesn&#039;t address. Background images for website layout and decoration are negligible. As the article mentioned, personal pages that have photos could be counted as negligible as well, but place encouraging remarks and suggestions that the individual include a descriptive bit of text for the alt tag. Other than that, any other embedded image, whether a photo, or image for a button or control ought to have some sort of alternate text, a description, or caption. If it&#039;s not worthy of trying to describe, don&#039;t even put it there. If the information in it&#039;s content is so important, show it, and tell in text what it is. 

But that&#039;s just the way I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very glad to see more movie theaters equipped with Rear Window technology. I was a little disappointed to learn that only about 1% currently are. Although the equipment isn&#8217;t really all that far fetched. Heck, it&#8217;s just the price of a couple accessible ready computer systems, or a cheap used car. With the bucks any given theater makes, it shouldn&#8217;t be too unreasonable. It probably costs that much for one of their popcorn machines. </p>
<p>I have mixed emotions over making web pages talk though. Blind web surfers most likely already have some sort of text to speech technology. Making a redundant voice on a web page to read it will only create a confusing situation of listening to two separate voices, at different quality, and different reading speed. Folks who might need it most are those who are on the fringes of poor eyesight, or in denial over their blindness, and don&#8217;t have a text to speech product. Having a large print, easy to see button might then be helpful. I&#8217;m sure coding it into the web page wouldn&#8217;t be hard, but the web site owner would need to have the ability to run it on the server, and pay for the online site license. I know I can&#8217;t afford it for my web pages. Most browsers have some sort of zoom feature to enlarge the text to 4 times or more.Although adding extra style sheets would be another thing, and probably the best thing a web site developer could do. </p>
<p>The next best thing to do is to ban captcha images, and improve how screen readers access flash media players. Making photos readable shouldn&#8217;t be all that important, unless they convey vital information that other text doesn&#8217;t address. Background images for website layout and decoration are negligible. As the article mentioned, personal pages that have photos could be counted as negligible as well, but place encouraging remarks and suggestions that the individual include a descriptive bit of text for the alt tag. Other than that, any other embedded image, whether a photo, or image for a button or control ought to have some sort of alternate text, a description, or caption. If it&#8217;s not worthy of trying to describe, don&#8217;t even put it there. If the information in it&#8217;s content is so important, show it, and tell in text what it is. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just the way I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OCEAN BLUE BACKS THE YOUVIEW STANDARD by keith</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/11/ocean-blue-backs-the-youview-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=243#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Wow. Sounds great. I&#039;d love to see the TV stations in the US work on a project like this. Having access to onscreen menus and text has been way too long in coming. Digital TV signals may be the best thing to happen to make it come about. The extra apps sounds like an interesting way to blur the lines between TV entertainment, and web surfing. It could open some doors for certain folks who may not quite be computer literate enough to browse the web, but who might be able to make sense of a TV remote, and menu system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Sounds great. I&#8217;d love to see the TV stations in the US work on a project like this. Having access to onscreen menus and text has been way too long in coming. Digital TV signals may be the best thing to happen to make it come about. The extra apps sounds like an interesting way to blur the lines between TV entertainment, and web surfing. It could open some doors for certain folks who may not quite be computer literate enough to browse the web, but who might be able to make sense of a TV remote, and menu system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For all BVA members, wanted to request information if you know of a veteran who had surgery to correct vision and then had complications that resulted in blindness if by keith</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/11/for-all-bva-members-wanted-to-request-information-if-you-know-of-a-veteran-who-had-surgery-to-correct-vision-and-then-had-complications-that-resulted-in-blindness-if/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=241#comment-372</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what is being addressed in this post. Definitely, there is a problem with the RK surgery being discussed. What is the responce sought? Does Tom want others with this same surgery, and complications to contact him?

A mention of cataract surgery with complications is mentioned. Does Tom also want veterans to email him on this as well? 

What is the expectation of reporting these instances? Can the VA offer support, or followup, or additional benefits? Will it help pave the way to recieving a pension or compensation? 

I can&#039;t comment on the RK procedure, but I&#039;ve had complications after cataract surgery that have ultimately led to blindness. Not that the surgery failed, or was botched, or was the incorrect thing, but that other complications caused the sergery to be ineffective. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what is being addressed in this post. Definitely, there is a problem with the RK surgery being discussed. What is the responce sought? Does Tom want others with this same surgery, and complications to contact him?</p>
<p>A mention of cataract surgery with complications is mentioned. Does Tom also want veterans to email him on this as well? </p>
<p>What is the expectation of reporting these instances? Can the VA offer support, or followup, or additional benefits? Will it help pave the way to recieving a pension or compensation? </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t comment on the RK procedure, but I&#8217;ve had complications after cataract surgery that have ultimately led to blindness. Not that the surgery failed, or was botched, or was the incorrect thing, but that other complications caused the sergery to be ineffective. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on field trip to washing dc by maryellen</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/07/field-trip-to-washing-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>maryellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=149#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Excellent, 
FYI, you may want to correct to Washington, not washing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent,<br />
FYI, you may want to correct to Washington, not washing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination by maryellen</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/07/laura-schlesinger-said-that-as-an-observant-orthodox-jew-homosexuality-is-an-abomination/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>maryellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=153#comment-273</guid>
		<description>this should generate lots of responses!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this should generate lots of responses!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination by Keith</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/07/laura-schlesinger-said-that-as-an-observant-orthodox-jew-homosexuality-is-an-abomination/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=153#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Funny stuff! I have to comment on a less than humorous note though. The author of the piece does well in pointing out the &quot;discrepancies&quot; between the right way to live as defined in the Scriptures, compared to today&#039;s practices. Though it makes it seem that the Bible is hypocritical, what it really proves is how far the values of people have drifted over the centuries. 

Not to mention certain social definitions, and responsibilities were much different then than now. Back then, there were no police, so taking revenge for a wrong was perfectly acceptable. Even today, if a person doesn&#039;t take initiative to press charges for the legal system to spring into action, nobody else will. 

In ancient times slavery probably resembled something like our current system of employers and employees. In that sense, everybody who is not the owner of the corporation is the slave to the corporation. 

I think if my neighbor were to offer a burnt sacrifice of a young bullock in his backyard, my only thought would be, ?I wonder why he didn&#039;t invite me to the BBQ?&quot; Oh, that comment about playing football had me laughing. I suppose they could always make a kosher football from lamb or cattle. Would it make that much difference in how a person handled it in a game? Hmmm... 

One key point of the Bible is that it points out what good behavior is, and what sin really is, and the massive short fall that humans have to meet before we are to be &quot;good&quot; enough to live with God in the afterlife. That vast varience is the purpose of the Christian belief, and importance of why Jesus came to Earth. To forgive, and fill in the gap of those sins. Just something to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny stuff! I have to comment on a less than humorous note though. The author of the piece does well in pointing out the &#8220;discrepancies&#8221; between the right way to live as defined in the Scriptures, compared to today&#8217;s practices. Though it makes it seem that the Bible is hypocritical, what it really proves is how far the values of people have drifted over the centuries. </p>
<p>Not to mention certain social definitions, and responsibilities were much different then than now. Back then, there were no police, so taking revenge for a wrong was perfectly acceptable. Even today, if a person doesn&#8217;t take initiative to press charges for the legal system to spring into action, nobody else will. </p>
<p>In ancient times slavery probably resembled something like our current system of employers and employees. In that sense, everybody who is not the owner of the corporation is the slave to the corporation. </p>
<p>I think if my neighbor were to offer a burnt sacrifice of a young bullock in his backyard, my only thought would be, ?I wonder why he didn&#8217;t invite me to the BBQ?&#8221; Oh, that comment about playing football had me laughing. I suppose they could always make a kosher football from lamb or cattle. Would it make that much difference in how a person handled it in a game? Hmmm&#8230; </p>
<p>One key point of the Bible is that it points out what good behavior is, and what sin really is, and the massive short fall that humans have to meet before we are to be &#8220;good&#8221; enough to live with God in the afterlife. That vast varience is the purpose of the Christian belief, and importance of why Jesus came to Earth. To forgive, and fill in the gap of those sins. Just something to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Talking Books Celebrated by maryellen</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/06/digital-talking-books-celebrated/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>maryellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=143#comment-235</guid>
		<description>I hope we get to the LOC when we visit D.C.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we get to the LOC when we visit D.C.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Veterans&#8217; Medallion Available for Order by maryellen</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/07/veterans-medallion-available-for-order/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>maryellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=147#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Nice, I can&#039;t remember, I think my dad has a government marker, so this wouldn&#039;t apply, but I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, I can&#8217;t remember, I think my dad has a government marker, so this wouldn&#8217;t apply, but I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shinseki Stopped Hearing on Agent Orange Decision by Tod Schulte</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/06/shinseki-stopped-hearing-on-agent-orange-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod Schulte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=139#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Im from New York and apreciate the posts.We will for sure be referring our friends here to look for themselves! Hey i just came across your awesome blog.Keep it rolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im from New York and apreciate the posts.We will for sure be referring our friends here to look for themselves! Hey i just came across your awesome blog.Keep it rolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on agent orange update by Sheldon G. Nadler</title>
		<link>http://step-in-out.com/2010/04/agent-orange-update/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon G. Nadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://step-in-out.com/?p=79#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I am a Vietnam vet and I had a 6-way bypass in 1998 for IHD.I submitted my 1st claim in 2003 and have done so for the next 7 years. I am 100% and permanently disabled from PTSD, Diabetes type 2, lung cancer, and neuropathy in both feet. I am sick and tired of filing claims and being denied. Also, Senator Jim Webb also seems to be holding up the enforcement of the new diseases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Vietnam vet and I had a 6-way bypass in 1998 for IHD.I submitted my 1st claim in 2003 and have done so for the next 7 years. I am 100% and permanently disabled from PTSD, Diabetes type 2, lung cancer, and neuropathy in both feet. I am sick and tired of filing claims and being denied. Also, Senator Jim Webb also seems to be holding up the enforcement of the new diseases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

